Penalty Abatement Analyzer
By Forrest Baumhover, CFP®, EA · Last verified October 2, 2026
Check First-Time Abate and Automatic Exemption from Penalty eligibility, and rank reasonable-cause arguments.
The Penalty Abatement Analyzer checks First-Time Abate (FTA) and the IRS's Automatic Exemption from Penalty (AEP) program against the three-year clean-compliance test they share, then ranks reasonable-cause arguments when neither applies. It serves practitioners assessing a client's penalty notice.
Two programs, similar tests, and a publication gap
Confirm the penalty, then request First-Time Abate if this period qualifies (it uses your one waiver); otherwise argue reasonable cause.
IR-2026-83 (July 8, 2026) announced Automatic Exemption from Penalty: the IRS now suppresses the failure-to-file, failure-to-pay, and failure-to-deposit penalty assessment itself, automatically, for a taxpayer with three years of clean compliance history, requiring no request. Which mechanism governs a given return depends on the return's own tax year or quarter, not on preference — this page names three bands:
- Band A (tax year 2024 and earlier, and 2025 quarterly returns and earlier): First-Time Abate alone. You need not name it, but you must contact the IRS.
- Band B (tax year 2025, and 2026 quarterly returns due in 2026): the transition band, where both programs are live.
- Band C (original due dates on or after January 1, 2027, which includes a fourth-quarter 2026 Form 941): AEP only, for a return you file within three years of its original due date (¶(7)) — it replaces First-Time Abate, which no longer exists as a request path. IRS.gov's table keeps First-Time Abate for 2026 quarterly returns AEP did not consider; the update ends it for returns due on or after January 1, 2027.
- Returns AEP does not cover (Form 1041 and others not on the IRS list): First-Time Abate by request, as we read the update (it does not say so in terms), but not for returns the IRM excludes: those filed once or infrequently (such as Forms 706 and 709), Form 990, and the 1099 series (IRM 20.1.1.3.3.2.1 ¶(7)-(8)).
IRM Procedural Update sbse-20-0626-0643 (June 17, 2026) added IRM 20.1.1.3.3.2.5 (AEP itself) and 20.1.1.3.3.2.6 (a manual AEP grant when an established IRS error kept a Band B or C return out of AEP). The published IRM 20.1.1 includes neither yet and ends at 20.1.1.3.3.2.4. Cite the update by number, sbse-20-0626-0643, until publication catches up.
Worked example — the transition band
A failure-to-pay penalty applies to a 2025 individual return. The taxpayer timely filed the same return type in each of the prior three years and has no unreversed penalty in that lookback. Both eligibility gates pass, and whether AEP already applied is not yet known. The analyzer returns Band B, flagged ambiguous — the facts alone don't establish which outcome applies; the transcript does, not a Transaction Code (TC) 161, 271, or 167 alone (see the FAQ below on why):
- A CP95, CP95(SP), CP195B or CP895(b) notice shows AEP applied. An unreversed TC 971 AC 996 shows AEP or a prior FTA grant (update ¶(12)).
- If a penalty notice arrives instead, with none of those markers on the transcript: AEP did not fire for this return, which is an ordinary transition outcome — not by itself evidence the taxpayer failed the eligibility test. Request First-Time Abate manually: it still exists as a request path in this band and is the default remedy, ahead of the manual IRS-error grant below.
Relief and an unreversed penalty both use up the lookback
FTA and AEP both require a clean three-year history. A First-Time Abate grant for this period counts against both programs for three years (IRM 20.1.1.3.3.2.1 ¶(11); update ¶(12)). An AEP grant bars a second AEP grant for three years (¶(17)); the update does not say whether it also blocks a later First-Time Abate, so check the transcript. A penalty left unreversed also fails the First-Time Abate lookback, so declining relief now preserves nothing. The update describes no way to decline AEP. Check the penalty first: a wrong penalty comes off without spending the waiver (IRM 20.1.1.3).
If your history meets the First-Time Abate criteria, the IRS applies First-Time Abate first, even if your request argues reasonable cause (IRM 20.1.1.3.3.2.1 ¶(12)). Where First-Time Abate does not apply, reasonable cause costs no lookback and leaves the period compliant if no other penalty shows (update ¶(20) Note), but the IRS can deny it.
When only reasonable cause remains
This tool rates death, serious illness, or unavoidable absence (IRM 20.1.1.3.2.2.1) and fire, casualty, or natural disaster (.2.2.2) as carrying the most weight. Inability to obtain records (.2.2.3) rates weaker, and the IRM says reliance on a tax professional (.2.2.5) generally is not a basis for reasonable cause. Neither FTA nor AEP reaches accuracy-related penalties: IRC §6662 sits outside the three penalties both programs cover. There, reasonable cause (IRC §6664(c)) is one defense; also check substantial authority or disclosure (IRC §6662(d)(2)(B)) and written supervisory approval (IRC §6751(b)). Supply dates, names, and specifics for any factor you argue.
Beyond FTA and AEP
- AEP-eligible Band B or C return with an assessment: passing the gates does not show an IRS error. The IRS grants AEP manually only when an IRS error kept a qualified return from receiving it, so name the error and ask for the manual AEP grant (IRM 20.1.1.3.3.2.6). In Band B, also ask for First-Time Abate; it needs no error finding. If neither fits, request reasonable cause (IRM 20.1.1.3.2).
- The return sits in the transition band and the transcript does not show whether AEP already applied.
- The penalty is an accuracy-related penalty under IRC §6662, which neither FTA nor AEP reaches.
- A large penalty is at stake and the period may hold an IRS error worth fixing first.
Common Questions
What is the Automatic Exemption from Penalty (AEP)?
A systemic IRS program, announced in IR-2026-83, that suppresses a qualifying failure-to-file, failure-to-pay, or failure-to-deposit penalty at original return processing, needing no taxpayer request. It uses the three-year clean-compliance test First-Time Abate already used; the extra business-return conditions differ.
Is First-Time Abate going away?
Not entirely, and not yet. AEP replaces it only for returns with an original due date on or after January 1, 2027. For earlier eligible periods, including the transition band, First-Time Abate remains a manual request path.
How does a practitioner know if AEP already applied to a client's penalty?
Look for the markers the worked example lists: a CP95, CP195B or CP895(b) notice, or a TC 971 Action Code 996, which also posts for a prior First-Time Abate grant. The IRM describes the 996 only for tax years 2022 and later on Forms 1040, 940, 941, 943, 944 and 945 (IRM 20.1.1.3.3.2.4), so a missing 996 proves nothing for other years or forms. A TC 161 or 271 shows abatement of an already-assessed penalty, not AEP on its own; a TC 167 alone proves nothing here: Doc 6209 ties it to a due-date or tax-due change, and IRM 20.1.1.3.3.2.2 shows the IRS also posted its 2019–2020 late-filing relief as a TC 167.
Does First-Time Abate cost anything to use?
Not in dollars, but it is not free. FTA and AEP both need a clean three-year penalty history, and a First-Time Abate grant counts against the next three years, unless the IRS later finds the penalty was not owed.
More from the Desk
Ready to write to the IRS? Ask for relief with the Penalty Abatement Letter Builder, which turns the facts into a draft request letter with each IRM test cited.
Want the dollar figure first? The IRS Penalty and Interest Calculator adds up the failure-to-file penalty, the failure-to-pay penalty, and interest, using your own dates and payments.
Read the Deep Dive behind this tool: Deep Dive: Why You May Be Filing FTA Requests You No Longer Need