TC 308: Additional Tax Assessment by Examination or Appeals
By Forrest Baumhover, CFP®, EA · Last verified September 12, 2026
TC 308 is TC 298's examination-track twin — an additional tax assessment carrying a mandatory interest computation date — but specifically for a deficiency that Examination or Appeals determined, which means the assessment followed an actual audit rather than a routine processing adjustment.
What the code actually does
IRS Document 6209 defines TC 308 as "Additional Tax Assessment by Examination or Appeals with Interest Computation Date," Doc Code 47: it "inputs an Examination Deficiency of tax to a module (the IRS's record for one tax period within the account) which contains a TC 150. Generates assessment of interest from the interest computation date which must be included in the transaction... Otherwise same as TC 300." TC 300 is the general examination/Appeals assessment code, so TC 308 is functionally that assessment plus a required, specific interest start date.
Document 6209 also flags a compatibility rule worth knowing: on BMF (Business Master File) modules, TC 308 "can be used with another tax adjustment code, except TC 304, 305 or 309" — the carryback-family codes. That exclusion exists because those codes already carry their own interest-computation-date logic tied to a prior tentative allowance, and combining them with TC 308's own date would create a conflict.
The governing procedure moved — same finding as TC 298
As with TC 298, the specific interest-computation-date entry procedure this code relies on used to live in IRM 4.4.12, Examined Closings, Surveyed Claims, Partial Assessments, and Closings to Appeals. That subsection (4.4.12.5.20) is now formally marked removed, with the current text pointing to its successor: IRM 4.38.1.7.3.1.20, Item 11: Interest Computation Date. That successor section, fetched live this session, names TC 308 by number and states the requirement directly: it "must include an interest computation date, entered in Item 11 of Form 5344."
The same source also draws the boundary between TC 308 and TC 298 explicitly, describing TC 308 as assessing "an Examination tax deficiency" specifically — reinforcing that the code is reserved for assessments that actually came out of an examination or Appeals determination, not a routine processing correction.
What this means for the account
A TC 308 on the transcript means Examination or Appeals determined a deficiency and assessed it with a specific interest start date entered on Form 5344 when the case was closed. Because this followed an actual examination, it is worth establishing whether the case was agreed or unagreed — an unagreed deficiency typically means a Notice of Deficiency and a 90-day Tax Court petition window preceded the assessment, which affects what can still be challenged.
As with TC 298, do not assume the interest computation date matches the return's original due date — it is a specific figure the examiner entered, and confirming it is the only reliable way to know how much interest has actually accrued.
What TC 308 gets confused with
TC 308 is easiest to confuse with TC 298, which does the same interest-computation-date-driven assessment but through routine processing rather than an examination or Appeals determination, and behaves "same as TC 290" instead of "same as TC 300." Which code is on the transcript tells a practitioner whether an actual exam or Appeals case sits behind the number.
It is also distinct from plain TC 300 — TC 308 is TC 300 with the added, mandatory interest-computation-date requirement, used specifically when the standard interest-start assumption does not apply to the case being closed.
The practitioner's actual next step
Establish whether the underlying case was agreed or unagreed — that history determines whether a Notice of Deficiency and Tax Court rights preceded this assessment.
Confirm the interest computation date entered on Form 5344, Item 11, rather than assuming interest runs from the return due date.
Check for TC 304, 305, or 309 on the same module — Document 6209 flags those as incompatible with a TC 308 on the same document, so their joint appearance is worth investigating as a possible data issue.
Pull the complete account history with the IRS Transcript Decoder to confirm whether TC 308 or its processing-track counterpart, TC 298, actually generated the assessment.